How BEPS 2.0 impacts Transfer Pricing Documentation and strategies

As global tax regulations tighten, the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 framework has introduced significant changes for multinational enterprises (MNEs). Designed to combat tax avoidance, BEPS 2.0 enforces stricter transfer pricing documentation rules, reshaping how businesses manage intercompany transactions. This article explores the core elements of BEPS 2.0, its impact on transfer pricing, and the strategic adjustments companies should make to ensure compliance and operational efficiency.operational efficiency.

Understanding BEPS 2.0

BEPS 2.0 builds on the original BEPS Action Plan and introduces two key pillars:

• Pillar One reallocates taxing rights for highly digitalized and global businesses, ensuring that a portion of profits is taxed in market jurisdictions.
• Pillar Two enforces a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%, preventing MNEs from shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions.

These changes aim to create a fairer global tax system, increasing transparency and consistency across jurisdictions. However, they also bring significant challenges, particularly in the realm of transfer pricing documentation.

For further details, refer to the OECD’s official BEPS 2.0 framework.

Impact of BEPS 2.0 on Transfer Pricing Documentation

Stricter Documentation Requirements

Under BEPS 2.0, companies must maintain more detailed and transparent transfer pricing documentation. The requirements now include:

• A Master File outlining the group's global operations and financial structure.
• A Local File documenting intercompany transactions in each jurisdiction.
• A Country-by-Country Report (CbCR) detailing revenue, profit, taxes paid, and other financial metrics across all operating countries.

To ensure compliance, these elements must be consistent, accurate, and aligned with the company’s broader tax strategy.

"The OECD’s focus on aligning documentation with economic substance means that vague or boilerplate explanations will no longer suffice. Businesses need to ensure that their documentation tells a coherent story across jurisdictions."
— Michał Olejniczka, Transfer Pricing Specialist

Greater Emphasis on Economic Substance

Tax authorities are intensifying scrutiny to ensure intercompany transactions reflect actual economic substance. Companies must now:

• Justify transfer pricing policies with detailed functional analyses.
• Align profits with value creation, especially for intellectual property (IP) and digital transactions.
• Provide clear evidence that controlled transactions follow the arm’s length principle.

For more information on this principle, consult the OECD’s Arm’s Length Guidance.

Challenges Businesses Face Under BEPS 2.0

1. Global Minimum Tax Compliance
   Companies operating in low-tax jurisdictions must adjust transfer pricing strategies to meet the 15% minimum tax rate while minimizing tax burdens.
2. Consistency Across Documentation
   BEPS 2.0 mandates alignment between the Master File, Local File, and CbCR. Any discrepancies can increase audit risks and penalties.
3. Increased Scrutiny and Audit Risks
   With greater tax transparency, authorities are more capable of identifying inconsistencies, leading to more frequent and aggressive transfer pricing audits.

Case Study:
Following the implementation of CbCR, tax authorities in countries like Germany, India, and Australia significantly increased their audits. Many companies found that their existing documentation no longer met the stricter compliance standards.

How to Adapt Your Transfer Pricing Strategy

1. Strengthen Internal Processes
   Implement robust internal controls to ensure consistency in transfer pricing documentation. Key actions include:
2. Reconciling transfer pricing data with financial statements.Establishing cross-functional collaboration between finance, tax, and legal teams.Automating data collection to minimize manual errors and inconsistencies.
3. Reevaluate Your Value Chain
   Ensure that profits align with value creation by reassessing:
4. Where critical decision-making functions take place.The role and location of intellectual property within the business.The economic justification for intercompany charges.
5. Leverage Technology for Compliance
   Using AI-powered tax solutions like TP Catalyst or ONESOURCE can automate documentation updates, CbCR preparation, and benchmarking analysis.
6. Engage Transfer Pricing Experts
   Given the complexity of local tax regulations, working with specialized consultants can help ensure jurisdiction-specific compliance while mitigating risks.

"Local nuances cannot be underestimated. Some jurisdictions accept statistical benchmarking methods, while others strictly prohibit them. Tailored solutions are essential for compliance."
— Grzegorz Plisz, International Tax Advisor

Preparing for the Future

The implementation of BEPS 2.0 represents a major shift in global taxation. Companies that take a proactive approach—strengthening documentation, leveraging automation, and ensuring compliance—will be in the best position to navigate these changes.

If you need expert guidance in managing BEPS 2.0 compliance, we’re here to help.

📞 Contact us today for a free consultation
📧 Email us at [grzegorz.plisz@benchmarket.pl]
🌐 Schedule a meeting here

‍